An ethical decision-making framework is most likely to do which of the following?

An ethical decision-making framework is most likely to do which of the following?

• A. Include a pre-determined, uniform sequence.
• B. Focus exclusively on confirmable facts and relationships.
• C. Help avoid a decision that has unanticipated ethical consequences.
• D. Rely on personal intuition.

Answer: (C)

An ethical decision-making framework is designed to foresee and prevent outcomes that could create unanticipated ethical problems. In real-world decisions, consequences aren’t always obvious at first glance, so a good framework pushes you to consider who will be affected, what duties and values apply, and what the potential harms or benefits might be before acting. This proactive examination helps avoid choices that later reveal ethical issues you hadn’t anticipated. It isn’t just a rigid, pre-set sequence you follow in every situation—contexts vary, so the framework should guide thoughtful analysis rather than applying a one-size-fits-all recipe. It also goes beyond raw facts; ethical judgment involves duties, rights, and the broader impact on stakeholders, not only what can be measured or verified. Relying on personal intuition misses this structured consideration and can miss or misjudge ethical implications.

An ethical decision-making framework is designed to foresee and prevent outcomes that could create unanticipated ethical problems. In real-world decisions, consequences aren’t always obvious at first glance, so a good framework pushes you to consider who will be affected, what duties and values apply, and what the potential harms or benefits might be before acting. This proactive examination helps avoid choices that later reveal ethical issues you hadn’t anticipated.

It isn’t just a rigid, pre-set sequence you follow in every situation—contexts vary, so the framework should guide thoughtful analysis rather than applying a one-size-fits-all recipe. It also goes beyond raw facts; ethical judgment involves duties, rights, and the broader impact on stakeholders, not only what can be measured or verified. Relying on personal intuition misses this structured consideration and can miss or misjudge ethical implications.